Self-Publishing Vs Traditional Publishing Tips
- Alpha Book Publisher
- Aug 17, 2024
- 6 min read

Is It Cheaper to Self-Publish or Get a Publisher?
Self-Publishing:
Upfront Costs: Self-publishing requires the author to pay for services like editing, cover design, and marketing, which can range from $500 to $5,000 or more, depending on the level of professionalism you desire. Platforms like Amazon KDP allow free eBook publishing, but authors should still invest in professional services to ensure quality.
Control Over Costs: The author controls how much they want to spend and can use free or budget-friendly tools for aspects like formatting and design.
Traditional Publishing:
No Upfront Costs: With traditional publishing, the publisher pays for everything—editing, cover design, printing, and marketing. The author doesn’t have to invest any money upfront.
Earnings Trade-Off: Though you don’t pay upfront, authors earn smaller royalties (typically 10-15%), so it may take longer to see substantial earnings.
Do You Make More Money with a Publisher or Self-Publishing?
Self-Publishing:
Higher Royalties: Self-published authors can earn up to 70% of the book’s price on platforms like Amazon KDP for eBooks and up to 60% for print-on-demand paperbacks.
No Advance: Self-publishing doesn’t come with an advance, meaning you only earn when your book sells.
Traditional Publishing:
Lower Royalties: Authors typically earn 10-15% in royalties, which is significantly lower than self-publishing.
Advance: Traditional publishers often provide an advance, which is money paid upfront before book sales begin. The advance can range from $5,000 to $50,000 or more, depending on the author’s profile and book potential.
In the long term, self-publishing can be more profitable for authors who effectively market their books and sell well, while traditional publishing offers a more stable upfront payment but lower royalties.
What Is the Difference Between Self-Publishing and Traditional Publishing Music?
The key difference between self-publishing and traditional publishing in music mirrors the book industry:
Traditional Music Publishing: A music publisher handles licensing, promotion, and distribution for the artist’s music. The publisher takes a significant share (usually 50%) of royalties but helps get the music into movies, commercials, and other venues.
Self-Publishing in Music: Musicians retain full control and ownership of their music but are responsible for all promotion, licensing, and distribution. Self-published musicians keep a higher percentage of royalties but must handle business logistics.
What Is the Difference Between a Publisher and a Self-Publisher?
Publisher (Traditional): A traditional publisher invests in your book by paying for editing, design, production, and marketing. They take the financial risk but also take a large portion of the royalties (usually 85-90%). The author has less creative control, and the publisher makes key decisions regarding the book’s direction.
Self-Publisher: A self-publisher (the author) takes on all responsibilities of producing and marketing the book. The author pays for the services but keeps a larger share of royalties (up to 70%). The author retains all rights and creative control over the book.
Self-Publishing vs. Traditional Publishing: Pros and Cons
Self-Publishing Pros:
Creative Control: You make all decisions regarding content, cover, and pricing.
Higher Royalties: Authors can keep up to 70% of royalties, leading to potentially higher profits per sale.
Faster Publishing Process: Self-publishing can be done in weeks or months, rather than the 12-18 months it may take for traditional publishing.
Ownership: You retain full rights to your book.
Self-Publishing Cons:
Upfront Costs: You must pay for editing, cover design, and marketing.
Marketing Responsibility: You handle all promotional efforts, which can be time-consuming.
Limited Physical Distribution: Getting your book into physical bookstores is challenging for self-published authors.
Traditional Publishing Pros:
Professional Support: Publishers provide expert editing, cover design, and marketing services.
Wider Distribution: Traditional publishers have established relationships with bookstores and libraries, leading to better physical distribution.
No Upfront Costs: You don’t pay for editing, design, or production.
Traditional Publishing Cons:
Lower Royalties: You typically earn 10-15% of the book’s sales.
Loss of Creative Control: The publisher has the final say on cover design, editorial decisions, and sometimes even the book’s title.
Slow Process: Traditional publishing can take over a year before the book hits the market.

Why Self-Publishing Is Bad (Common Criticisms)
While self-publishing offers many advantages, it is often criticized for:
Quality Control: Without professional editing, some self-published books may suffer from poor writing, formatting, or cover design.
Marketing Challenges: Self-publishing puts all the marketing burden on the author, making it difficult to reach readers without experience or resources.
Limited Distribution: Self-published books may struggle to reach traditional brick-and-mortar bookstores, which are more likely to stock traditionally published books.
However, many of these challenges can be mitigated by investing in professional services and leveraging online platforms like social media for marketing.
Do You Make More Money Self-Publishing or Traditional Publishing?
Self-Publishing:
Higher Royalties: Up to 70% of sales, meaning you keep most of the profits.
Long-Term Earnings Potential: The more books you sell, the higher the earnings, and you aren’t capped by an advance.
Traditional Publishing:
Lower Royalties: Authors typically receive 10-15% royalties.
Advance Payment: Traditional publishers provide an upfront payment, so you start earning before the book is published. However, you won’t receive royalties until your advance is "earned out" (when book sales have covered the advance).
In the long run, self-publishing can lead to more money per sale, but traditional publishing may be more financially stable due to the advance and professional backing.
Self-Publishing vs. Traditional Publishing on Reddit
On Reddit, authors often debate the merits of both publishing options:
Self-Publishing: Redditors who favor self-publishing often emphasize the freedom and higher earnings potential, but acknowledge that marketing is difficult without a dedicated audience.
Traditional Publishing: Many Reddit users appreciate traditional publishing for the credibility, support, and wide distribution it provides but are frustrated by the long timelines and lower royalties.
What Is Traditional Publishing?
Traditional publishing refers to the process in which an author submits a manuscript to a publishing house (either directly or through a literary agent). If accepted, the publisher takes full responsibility for editing, designing, printing, distributing, and marketing the book. The publisher pays for these services and provides the author with an advance against future royalties, but retains most control over the creative and business aspects of the book.
Disadvantages of Traditional Publishing
Lower Royalties: Authors typically earn 10-15% of each book sale, compared to up to 70% with self-publishing.
Loss of Creative Control: The publisher has the final say on major decisions, such as cover design, pricing, and even the book’s content.
Lengthy Process: From manuscript acceptance to book release, the traditional publishing process can take over a year.
Difficult to Get Accepted: It’s highly competitive to get a publishing deal, and many authors face rejections before being accepted by a publisher.
Is It Better to Self-Publish or Sell to a Publisher in Sims 4?
In The Sims 4, self-publishing and selling to a publisher have similar trade-offs to real life:
Self-Publish: You receive lower upfront payments but higher long-term royalties.
Sell to Publisher: You receive an immediate, lump-sum payment with lower royalties in the long run.
This mimics real-world publishing decisions where self-publishing offers higher potential earnings but requires long-term marketing effort, while traditional publishing provides immediate financial stability through an advance.
Is Traditional Publishing Worth It?
Traditional publishing is worth it if:
You Want Professional Support: Publishers handle all aspects of production, editing, and marketing, leaving you to focus on writing.
You Seek Credibility: Traditional publishers offer more credibility, often opening the door for awards, reviews, and physical bookstore placements.
You Prefer No Upfront Costs: Traditional publishing is financially risk-free for the author, as the publisher covers all costs.
However, if you value creative control, faster publication, and higher royalties, self-publishing may be a better fit.
Final Thoughts
Self-publishing and traditional publishing each have their unique advantages. Self-publishing offers greater control, higher royalties, and faster publishing, but it comes with upfront costs and marketing responsibilities. Traditional publishing, on the other hand, provides professional support, wider distribution, and an advance payment, though with lower royalties and less creative input. The best option depends on your goals as an author and your willingness to manage the various aspects of the publishing process.
Comments